Corrections and voids

[CORRECTED 2026-09-15: every filing behind this cluster is a new-issue allocation priced by the issuer's own 424B7 0001104659-26-107089 @ $21.5 (5 verified per filing, 5 by the offering_check manifest) — an offering makes all participants 'buy' the same day at the same price, so this is not an insider cluster]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $47.5K. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-30: the certificate sweep read this filing against this sentence and the `settlement` check did not hold — $360.0K cost to acquire, $2.9M net, while the filing says the filing settles the strike in shares withheld by the issuer, so no cash was paid for them. Re-derived through sibyl's own emitters over the document as re-read on 2026-08-30, and the sentence above is what they produce for this row's leg. NOTHING IS RECOMPUTED BY HAND: every figure in it comes from the filing, and the re-derived sentence was itself put back through the verifier before it was written. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-30: the certificate sweep read this filing against this sentence and the `lateness` check did not hold — reported 2026-08-27, while the filing says these transactions reached the public on 2026-07-17 (the day the Form 4 this 4/A restates was submitted). Re-derived through sibyl's own emitters over the document as re-read on 2026-08-30, and the sentence above is what they produce for this row's leg. NOTHING IS RECOMPUTED BY HAND: every figure in it comes from the filing, and the re-derived sentence was itself put back through the verifier before it was written. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — one day-gap was quantified over shares of two different ages: the number published is the WIDEST gap any of the sold shares carried, and the sentence applied it to all of them, so shares sold on the day they were created were dated days before the sale — the split is now printed with the share count in each part. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-30: the certificate sweep read this filing against this sentence and the `lateness` check did not hold — reported 2026-08-27, while the filing says these transactions reached the public on 2026-07-17 (the day the Form 4 this 4/A restates was submitted). Re-derived through sibyl's own emitters over the document as re-read on 2026-08-30, and the sentence above is what they produce for this row's leg. NOTHING IS RECOMPUTED BY HAND: every figure in it comes from the filing, and the re-derived sentence was itself put back through the verifier before it was written. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — one day-gap was quantified over shares of two different ages: the number published is the WIDEST gap any of the sold shares carried, and the sentence applied it to all of them, so shares sold on the day they were created were dated days before the sale — the split is now printed with the share count in each part. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-30: the certificate sweep read this filing against this sentence and the `lateness` check did not hold — reported 2026-08-27, while the filing says these transactions reached the public on 2026-07-17 (the day the Form 4 this 4/A restates was submitted). Re-derived through sibyl's own emitters over the document as re-read on 2026-08-30, and the sentence above is what they produce for this row's leg. NOTHING IS RECOMPUTED BY HAND: every figure in it comes from the filing, and the re-derived sentence was itself put back through the verifier before it was written. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — one day-gap was quantified over shares of two different ages: the number published is the WIDEST gap any of the sold shares carried, and the sentence applied it to all of them, so shares sold on the day they were created were dated days before the sale — the split is now printed with the share count in each part. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: served as a restatement of accession 0002117905-26-000019 writing $22.9M down to $10.8M. This Form 4/A restates 0002117905-26-000020, not 0002117905-26-000019: its own <dateOfOriginalSubmission> is 2026-08-20, 0002117905-26-000019 reports period 2026-08-19 while 0002117905-26-000020 reports 2026-08-20, and this 4/A reproduces 0002117905-26-000020's legs exactly — it corrects a BDR leg's acquired/disposed code and leaves the reported $10.8M sale untouched. So nothing restated the $22,867,600 that signals id 17552 serves, and the $10.8M on this row is the same sale signals id 18563 serves from 0002117905-26-000020. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-31: this row called 3 co-timed C-suite buys "token-sized individually" while printing Gordon Scott $589.6K beside the phrase. That wording was a fixed string on every firing of this tier, and the tier's own trigger never tested the size of a cheque — it is reached because fewer than 3 buyers cleared the $100.0K materiality floor, which is a statement about how MANY of them did, not about how small they were. The sentence above is what the tier now produces from the same constituents, reading the floor its trigger reads. No buyer, no figure and no total has changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $30.5M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CFO and CEO" -> "incl. CFO and a C-suite officer"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-30: the certificate sweep read this filing against this sentence and the `venue` check did not hold — the claim, while the filing says otherwise. Re-derived through sibyl's own emitters over the document as re-read on 2026-08-30, and the sentence above is what they produce for this row's leg. NOTHING IS RECOMPUTED BY HAND: every figure in it comes from the filing, and the re-derived sentence was itself put back through the verifier before it was written. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the head denied a position reduction over a sale a double-digit fraction of which came out of stock the filer already held. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "$877.1K cost to acquire, $1.3M net" — the filing settles the strike in shares withheld by the issuer, so no cash was paid for them (cash from the sale is $2.2M, not $1.3M). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-31: the shares behind this row are already counted by signals id 19415. This filing's own footnote reports them as sold directly by Boardwalk II Aggregator L.P., which is a reporting person on 0001193125-26-368714 and not on this document — so 382,134 sh of the 2,001,323 sh that Boardwalk II Aggregator L.P. sold on 2026-08-25 at $21.85 are being disclosed a second time, by a filer who shares the power to dispose of them rather than holding them. $8.3M is inside the $56.2M that row publishes. THE ROW IS NOT WITHDRAWN AND ITS FIGURE IS NOT WRONG: the disclosure is real and the dispositive interest is real. What it may not do is add breadth, because conviction is a SUM by owner ruling and this money has been summed once already — so its conviction is capped at 1, the cap this feed gives a filing that reports another filer's transactions. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $1.1M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. President and CFO" -> "incl. CFO"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — shares the same filing surrendered to the issuer for tax under code F were counted as shares the filer kept; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $3.9M; $24.0M is exercise-and-sell (gross) and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: re-derived again from the constituent filings as they are served today, and the sentence above now follows them. What changed: published at $14.6M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. a C-suite officer, CEO and 2 directors" -> "incl. a C-suite officer and CEO"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: re-derived again from the constituent filings as they are served today, and the sentence above now follows them. What changed: published at $625.0K. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTED 2026-08-30: every filing behind this cluster is a new-issue allocation priced by the issuer's own 424B2 0001193125-26-349952 @ $50.0 (5 verified per filing, 5 by the offering_check manifest) — an offering makes all participants 'buy' the same day at the same price, so this is not an insider cluster]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $8.3M; 3 insiders counted, 0 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the purchases are one fixed-price allocation, not open-market conviction. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $2.0M; 4 insiders counted, 3 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. President and a C-suite officer" -> "incl. a C-suite officer"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $10.0M; 6 insiders counted, 5 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. a C-suite officer, CFO and 5 directors" -> "incl. a C-suite officer, CFO and 3 directors"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 455 the sentence publishes (455 == 455). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 26,560 the sentence publishes (26,560 == 26,560). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the sentence said shares were KEPT that the filing disposes of — a Rule 16b-3(e) return to the issuer under code D, which no branch of the parser read. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-31: this row named one reporting person and published the whole document's total. 0001193125-26-368714 is a single Form 4 filed jointly by 7 entities, and its own footnotes put $43.7M of it on Boardwalk II Aggregator L.P. and $12.5M of it on Submarine Buyer LLC. Those two are siblings under one general partner, not parent and child, and the filing has each reporting person disclaim the others' securities — so no control chain lets the name above carry the rest. The GROUP total and the direction were always right; what was missing was any way for a reader to see that $43.7M of it is another filer's. sibyl now reads every reporting person and every leg's own holder footnote, and the sentence above is what it produces from the filing re-read on 2026-08-31. No dollar figure has changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-26, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-25, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — the campaign span in this line read “24d” and the three filings it counts span 26 days. Re-derived on 2026-09-01 through the same rule that wrote it, this owner's qualifying buys in this issuer are 3 filings totalling $893.7K with head dates 2026-07-29, 2026-08-12, 2026-08-24 — 2026-07-29 to 2026-08-24 is 26 days. The 24 was measured against 2026-07-31, the day EDGAR INDEXED the earliest of them, and that row's head was corrected to its trade date on 2026-08-28 — one day AFTER this line was published, so the span was already stale when it was written. THE COUNT, THE TOTAL, THE DOLLARS AND THE ACTOR ARE UNCHANGED and re-derive exactly: only the number of days moves. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the filing's own description for this line reads "Asset acquired through a S&P Global (SPGI) spinoff." — a stub disposal from a corporate action, not a directional sale. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the filing's own description for this line reads "Asset acquired through a S&P Global (SPGI) spinoff." — a stub disposal from a corporate action, not a directional sale. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the filing's own description for this line reads "Asset acquired through a S&P Global (SPGI) spinoff." — a stub disposal from a corporate action, not a directional sale. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — shares the same filing surrendered to the issuer for tax under code F were counted as shares the filer kept; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — shares the same filing surrendered to the issuer for tax under code F were counted as shares the filer kept; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: re-derived again from the constituent filings as they are served today, and the sentence above now follows them. What changed: published at $10.1M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CFO and 2 directors" -> "incl. CFO and 1 director"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: re-derived again from the constituent filings as they are served today, and the sentence above now follows them. What changed: published at $4.7M; $926.3K is sell-to-cover (vest tax withholding); $3.4M is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $6.6M; 4 insiders counted, 3 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; $106.8M is exercise-and-sell (gross) and is not discretionary; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("4 insiders" -> "3 insiders"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $19.2M; $1.5M is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: this line was published without the fact that changes what it means, and the store has held that fact since the pending-merger flag shipped on 2026-08-26 — it is applied to a NEWER cluster row for this same issuer and not to this one, because the flag is asked at emit time and was never asked backwards. Re-derived for this repair through the scout's own `_merger_state` lookup rather than copied from that newer row: the issuer's deal is confirmed live today, and this window's 4 counted filing(s) are re-read from the store to count how many traded after it was signed. All of them did, so the cluster is capped at 2 (conviction 3 -> 2). No dollar figure, filer count or direction moves. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 12,270 the sentence publishes (12,270 == 12,270). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 9,258 the sentence publishes (9,258 == 9,258). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 9,543 the sentence publishes (9,543 == 9,543). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: the venue word "open-market" is not withdrawn — SEC code S covers an open-market sale AND a private one, and no footnote on this filing says which — but the reader should see what the numbers look like. Re-derived from 0001012975-26-000827 for this repair: 8 affiliated Fortress/Drawbridge vehicles disposed of 2,857,143 shares between them, every single leg at exactly $1.05, and 2,857,143 x $1.05 = $3,000,000.15 — an aggregate struck to a round three million dollars. None of the filing's footnotes is the weighted-average price undertaking a filer files when one reported line covers several fills at different prices. A tape execution does not ordinarily produce one price across eight accounts or a total that lands on a round number; a negotiated block does. This is stated as doubt and not as a finding, because the filing states no venue and inferring one from arithmetic is not evidence. `informed:1` is withdrawn: whatever the venue, a flat pre-agreed price is not a decision about the market price, and that flag claims it was. The dollars, the actor, the date and the direction are unchanged. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 3,635 the sentence publishes (3,635 == 3,635). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 30,000 the sentence publishes (30,000 == 30,000). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 80,095 the sentence publishes (80,095 == 80,095). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the held position FELL by 6,000" — the day's signed net is 0 (6,000 vs -0). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the head denied a position reduction over a sale a double-digit fraction of which came out of stock the filer already held. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "$1.5M strike bill" — the filing's own lot costs $0 (0.00 renders as $0); the row claimed "$1.5M cost to acquire, $45.8M net" — gross minus the bill is $47.3M ($47,338,834.93 - $0.00 = $47,338,834.93). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — one day-gap was quantified over shares of two different ages: the number published is the WIDEST gap any of the sold shares carried, and the sentence applied it to all of them, so shares sold on the day they were created were dated days before the sale — the split is now printed with the share count in each part. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "$277.5K strike bill" — the filing's own lot costs $276.6K (276,628.55 renders as $276.6K); the row claimed "$277.5K cost to acquire, $122.4K net" — gross minus the bill is $123.2K ($399,856.95 - $276,628.55 = $123,228.40). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the same PTR also records an unserved BOUGHT CALLS $250K-$500K leg on INTC, $50 strike, exp 2027-06-17 — the leg was read as ambiguous at ingest (the asset column names only the stock; the filing states the leg in its description) and filed sidecar-only. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the same PTR also records an unserved BOUGHT CALLS $500K-$1M leg on BE, $100 strike, exp 2027-06-17 — the leg was read as ambiguous at ingest (the asset column names only the stock; the filing states the leg in its description) and filed sidecar-only. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the same PTR also records an unserved BOUGHT CALLS $1M-$5M leg on BE, $100 strike, exp 2027-06-17 — the leg was read as ambiguous at ingest (the asset column names only the stock; the filing states the leg in its description) and filed sidecar-only. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTED 2026-08-25: every filing behind this cluster is a new-issue allocation priced by the issuer's own 424B5 0001493152-26-039572 @ $3.2 (3 verified per filing, 3 by the offering_check manifest) — an offering makes all participants 'buy' the same day at the same price, so this is not an insider cluster]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-25: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote states the shares were sold under a mandatory sell-to-cover arrangement to pay tax withholding on the 2026-08-20 RSU vest — original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the head denied a position reduction over a sale a double-digit fraction of which came out of stock the filer already held. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-25: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote states the shares were sold under a mandatory sell-to-cover arrangement to pay tax withholding on the 2026-08-20 RSU vest — original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — one day-gap was quantified over shares of two different ages: the number published is the WIDEST gap any of the sold shares carried, and the sentence applied it to all of them, so shares sold on the day they were created were dated days before the sale — the split is now printed with the share count in each part. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "$318.5K strike bill" — the filing's own lot costs $958.0K (958,003.20 renders as $958.0K); the row claimed "$318.5K cost to acquire, $4.8M net" — gross minus the bill is $4.1M ($5,098,254.76 - $958,003.20 = $4,140,251.56). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-30: the certificate sweep read this filing against this sentence and the `lateness` check did not hold — reported 2026-08-24, while the filing says these transactions reached the public on 2026-06-12 (the day the Form 4 this 4/A restates was submitted). Re-derived through sibyl's own emitters over the document as re-read on 2026-08-30, and the sentence above is what they produce for this row's leg. NOTHING IS RECOMPUTED BY HAND: every figure in it comes from the filing, and the re-derived sentence was itself put back through the verifier before it was written. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $1.6M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CEO and President" -> "incl. CEO"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $3.7M; 2 co-filing note(s) now applied; $192.6M is sold off-market (secondary/repurchase/tender) and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $3.9M; 5 insiders counted, 3 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. President and 1 director" -> "3 insiders"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $12.5M; $209.5K is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost; $19.0M is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: re-derived again from the constituent filings as they are served today, and the sentence above now follows them. What changed: published at $14.1M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. a C-suite officer, CEO and 1 director" -> "incl. a C-suite officer and CEO"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $5.3M; $19.5M is exercise-and-sell (gross); $9.7M is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $1.2M, re-derived at $1.6M. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $4.0M; 5 insiders counted, 4 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; $800.4K is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $2.7M; 8 insiders counted, 5 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. President and a C-suite officer" -> "incl. a C-suite officer"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $1.2M; $117.9K is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $9.2M; 13 insiders counted, 11 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; $363.3K is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CEO, President and a C-suite officer" -> "incl. CEO and a C-suite officer"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $2.7M; $625.6K is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $5.8M; $28.5M is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $12.5M; 7 insiders counted, 6 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. a C-suite officer, CFO and 5 directors" -> "incl. a C-suite officer, CFO and 3 directors"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $51.1M; $7.0M is exercise-and-sell (gross) and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $690.7K; 3 insiders counted, 2 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; $273.6K is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. President and a C-suite officer" -> "incl. a C-suite officer"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $19.5M; $1.5M is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: this line was published without the fact that changes what it means, and the store has held that fact since the pending-merger flag shipped on 2026-08-26 — it is applied to a NEWER cluster row for this same issuer and not to this one, because the flag is asked at emit time and was never asked backwards. Re-derived for this repair through the scout's own `_merger_state` lookup rather than copied from that newer row: the issuer's deal is confirmed live today, and this window's 5 counted filing(s) are re-read from the store to count how many traded after it was signed. All of them did, so the cluster is capped at 2 (conviction 3 -> 2). No dollar figure, filer count or direction moves. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: re-derived again from the constituent filings as they are served today, and the sentence above now follows them. What changed: published at $10.6M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CFO and 3 directors" -> "incl. CFO and 2 directors"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $6.7M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CEO and President" -> "incl. CEO"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing does not support the vest or exercise the sentence named — it either says nothing about what created the shares this sale took, or the sale traces to no creation on the filing at all — so no mechanism is claimed for them; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing does not support the vest or exercise the sentence named — it either says nothing about what created the shares this sale took, or the sale traces to no creation on the filing at all — so no mechanism is claimed for them; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing does not support the vest or exercise the sentence named — it either says nothing about what created the shares this sale took, or the sale traces to no creation on the filing at all — so no mechanism is claimed for them; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the head denied a position reduction over a sale a double-digit fraction of which came out of stock the filer already held. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as plan, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing does not support the vest or exercise the sentence named — it either says nothing about what created the shares this sale took, or the sale traces to no creation on the filing at all — so no mechanism is claimed for them; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as plan, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as plan, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as plan, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-25: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote states the shares were sold under a mandatory sell-to-cover arrangement to pay tax withholding on the 2026-08-20 RSU vest — original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Fang Andy (Director) — discretionary sell — $351.0K of DASH (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001832390-26-000021's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to cover tax obligations in connection with the vesting of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs").” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-25, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $351.0K really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 7 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $220.62 on 2026-08-20 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 18560, signals id 18570, signals id 18573, signals id 18587, signals id 18588, signals id 18607. One identical price across 7 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 7 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "$317.0K strike bill" — the filing's own lot costs $311.1K (311,121.54 renders as $311.1K); the row claimed "$317.0K cost to acquire, $138.2K net" — gross minus the bill is $144.0K ($455,142.10 - $311,121.54 = $144,020.57). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-25: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote states the shares were sold under a mandatory sell-to-cover arrangement to pay tax withholding on the 2026-08-20 RSU vest — original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Lee Gordon S (CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER) — discretionary sell — $642.2K of DASH (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001635648-26-000012's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to cover tax obligations in connection with the vesting of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs").” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-25, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $642.2K really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 7 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $220.62 on 2026-08-20 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 18560, signals id 18570, signals id 18573, signals id 18587, signals id 18588, signals id 18632. One identical price across 7 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 7 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-25: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote states the shares were sold under a mandatory sell-to-cover arrangement to pay tax withholding on the 2026-08-20 RSU vest — original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing's own footnote says the transaction was made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which the unticked <aff10b5One> checkbox did not carry. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Sherringham Tia (GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY) — discretionary sell — $1.7M of DASH (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001899688-26-000014's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to cover tax obligations in connection with the vesting of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs").” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-25, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $1.7M really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 7 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $220.62 on 2026-08-20 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 18560, signals id 18570, signals id 18573, signals id 18587, signals id 18607, signals id 18632. One identical price across 7 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 7 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Yandell Keith (CHIEF BUSINESS OFFICER) — discretionary sell — $1.8M of DASH (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001833552-26-000014's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to cover tax obligations in connection with the vesting of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs").” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-25, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $1.8M really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 7 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $220.62 on 2026-08-20 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 18560, signals id 18570, signals id 18573, signals id 18588, signals id 18607, signals id 18632. One identical price across 7 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 7 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-25: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote states the shares were sold under a mandatory sell-to-cover arrangement to pay tax withholding on the 2026-08-20 RSU vest — original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing's own footnote says the transaction was made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which the unticked <aff10b5One> checkbox did not carry. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Adarkar Prabir (PRESIDENT AND COO) — discretionary sell — $3.8M of DASH (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001832612-26-000016's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to cover tax obligations in connection with the vesting of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs").” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-25, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $3.8M really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 7 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $220.62 on 2026-08-20 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 18560, signals id 18570, signals id 18587, signals id 18588, signals id 18607, signals id 18632. One identical price across 7 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 7 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Inukonda Ravi (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER) — discretionary sell — $4.3M of DASH (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001849709-26-000018's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to cover tax obligations in connection with the vesting of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs").” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-25, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $4.3M really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 7 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $220.62 on 2026-08-20 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 18560, signals id 18573, signals id 18587, signals id 18588, signals id 18607, signals id 18632. One identical price across 7 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 7 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 — invented-quantity (a strike range over shares that cost nothing). the row claimed "$176.6K strike bill" — the filing's own lot costs $260.3K (260,273.24 renders as $260.3K); the row claimed "32,818 sh at $14.15-$15.28" — cannot produce the $260.3K bill the same clause publishes (32,818 x $14.15 = $464,374.70, x $15.28 = $501,459.04; bill is $260,273.24); the row claimed "$176.6K cost to acquire, $7.9M net" — gross minus the bill is $7.8M ($8,034,698.82 - $260,273.24 = $7,774,425.59). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published $19.0M as ONE figure over TWO mechanisms, and the filing splits it. 0001832614-26-000028's own leg-level footnotes put $18.5M on legs the filer chose to sell and $476.5K on legs sold to satisfy tax withholding on a vest — a compulsory sale whose day and size were set by the vest and the tax rate, not by the seller. A single sentence cannot say both, so this row is SCOPED DOWN to the half its own words correctly describe ($18.5M), and the $476.5K of withholding is published as its own row beside this one rather than left inside it or dropped. NO DOLLAR IS LOST AND NONE IS INVENTED: $18.5M + $476.5K = $19.0M, which is what the document reports and what this row used to claim as a single decision. The sentence above is what today's emitters produce for the retained half from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-30: the certificate sweep read this filing against this sentence and the `lateness` check did not hold — reported 2026-08-21, while the filing says these transactions reached the public on 2026-07-17 (the day the Form 4 this 4/A restates was submitted). Re-derived through sibyl's own emitters over the document as re-read on 2026-08-30, and the sentence above is what they produce for this row's leg. NOTHING IS RECOMPUTED BY HAND: every figure in it comes from the filing, and the re-derived sentence was itself put back through the verifier before it was written. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $4.2M; $3.9M is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: re-derived again from the constituent filings as they are served today, and the sentence above now follows them. What changed: published at $4.9M; $926.3K is sell-to-cover (vest tax withholding); $2.3M is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $1.2M, re-derived at $1.6M; 4 insiders counted, 3 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-31: this row called 3 co-timed C-suite buys "token-sized individually" while printing Cappell Anthony $468.2K and Mazarakis John $256.3K beside the phrase. That wording was a fixed string on every firing of this tier, and the tier's own trigger never tested the size of a cheque — it is reached because fewer than 3 buyers cleared the $100.0K materiality floor, which is a statement about how MANY of them did, not about how small they were. The sentence above is what the tier now produces from the same constituents, reading the floor its trigger reads. No buyer, no figure and no total has changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $5.8M; $28.5M is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost and is not discretionary; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("3 directors" -> "3 insiders"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $24.8M; $4.9M is exercise-and-sell (gross) and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote says the shares were sold to cover the tax on a vest - mandatory mechanics, not a decision. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as $565.9K of discretionary selling; only $314.6K was discretionary — $251.3K was sell-to-cover tax withholding on a vest, split out by the filing's own leg-level footnotes. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Paulin Tim (Chief Financial Officer) — OFF-MARKET SELL (secondary offering) — $907.5K of LYNX (secondary offering, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing names a venue that is not the open market. 0001193125-26-361359's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Represents shares sold by the Reporting Person as a selling stockholder in the Issuer's initial public offering.” AN IPO IS NOT A SECONDARY, and this row named the wrong one. A secondary is a holder selling into a market that already exists; an initial public offering is the day that market opens, and these shares went to the underwriters at the offering price. The venue was never in doubt — what was wrong is the deal's NAME. The leg routed on a phrase true of any underwritten deal and the label then printed the family's only offering word. SEC transaction code S means securities DISPOSED OF and says nothing about where, so the letter never licensed the word "open-market" that this row asserted. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $907.5K really did leave and the direction stays BEARISH — what is withdrawn is the claim about WHERE it went, and with it the open-market conviction a fill implies. The sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. This row was published on 2026-08-22; the arm that reads its footnote shipped today, and it is being applied to the whole live population in the same pass that shipped it rather than to the one row an audit happened to name — which is the correction this round's part A exists to make possible. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Raduenz Brian (Director) — OFF-MARKET SELL (secondary offering) — $1.6M of LYNX (secondary offering, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing names a venue that is not the open market. 0001193125-26-361363's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Represents shares sold by the Reporting Person as a selling stockholder in the Issuer's initial public offering.” AN IPO IS NOT A SECONDARY, and this row named the wrong one. A secondary is a holder selling into a market that already exists; an initial public offering is the day that market opens, and these shares went to the underwriters at the offering price. The venue was never in doubt — what was wrong is the deal's NAME. The leg routed on a phrase true of any underwritten deal and the label then printed the family's only offering word. SEC transaction code S means securities DISPOSED OF and says nothing about where, so the letter never licensed the word "open-market" that this row asserted. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $1.6M really did leave and the direction stays BEARISH — what is withdrawn is the claim about WHERE it went, and with it the open-market conviction a fill implies. The sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. This row was published on 2026-08-22; the arm that reads its footnote shipped today, and it is being applied to the whole live population in the same pass that shipped it rather than to the one row an audit happened to name — which is the correction this round's part A exists to make possible. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Morrison Brian (Director, Chief Executive Officer) — OFF-MARKET SELL (secondary offering) — $3.1M of LYNX (secondary offering, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing names a venue that is not the open market. 0001193125-26-361354's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Represents shares sold by the Reporting Person as a selling stockholder in the Issuer's initial public offering.” AN IPO IS NOT A SECONDARY, and this row named the wrong one. A secondary is a holder selling into a market that already exists; an initial public offering is the day that market opens, and these shares went to the underwriters at the offering price. The venue was never in doubt — what was wrong is the deal's NAME. The leg routed on a phrase true of any underwritten deal and the label then printed the family's only offering word. SEC transaction code S means securities DISPOSED OF and says nothing about where, so the letter never licensed the word "open-market" that this row asserted. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $3.1M really did leave and the direction stays BEARISH — what is withdrawn is the claim about WHERE it went, and with it the open-market conviction a fill implies. The sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. This row was published on 2026-08-22; the arm that reads its footnote shipped today, and it is being applied to the whole live population in the same pass that shipped it rather than to the one row an audit happened to name — which is the correction this round's part A exists to make possible. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-20: Alty Matthew (Director, President) — OFF-MARKET SELL (secondary offering) — $3.9M of LYNX (secondary offering, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing names a venue that is not the open market. 0001193125-26-361370's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Represents shares sold by the Reporting Person as a selling stockholder in the Issuer's initial public offering.” AN IPO IS NOT A SECONDARY, and this row named the wrong one. A secondary is a holder selling into a market that already exists; an initial public offering is the day that market opens, and these shares went to the underwriters at the offering price. The venue was never in doubt — what was wrong is the deal's NAME. The leg routed on a phrase true of any underwritten deal and the label then printed the family's only offering word. SEC transaction code S means securities DISPOSED OF and says nothing about where, so the letter never licensed the word "open-market" that this row asserted. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $3.9M really did leave and the direction stays BEARISH — what is withdrawn is the claim about WHERE it went, and with it the open-market conviction a fill implies. The sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. This row was published on 2026-08-22; the arm that reads its footnote shipped today, and it is being applied to the whole live population in the same pass that shipped it rather than to the one row an audit happened to name — which is the correction this round's part A exists to make possible. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "$845.4K strike bill" — the filing's own lot costs $830.9K (830,858.45 renders as $830.9K). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing's own footnote says the transaction was made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which the unticked <aff10b5One> checkbox did not carry; the shares sold came from a share class converting, not from an award vesting. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $7.2M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. a C-suite officer, President and 1 director" -> "incl. a C-suite officer and 1 director"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $12.6M; 8 insiders counted, 6 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; $2.0M is exercise-and-sell (gross) and is not discretionary; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CEO and 4 directors" -> "incl. CEO and 3 directors"). Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: this line was published without the fact that changes what it means, and the store has held that fact since the pending-merger flag shipped on 2026-08-26 — it is applied to a NEWER cluster row for this same issuer and not to this one, because the flag is asked at emit time and was never asked backwards. Re-derived for this repair through the scout's own `_merger_state` lookup rather than copied from that newer row: the issuer's deal is confirmed live today, and this window's 5 counted filing(s) are re-read from the store to count how many traded after it was signed. All of them did, so the cluster is capped at 2 (conviction 3 -> 2). No dollar figure, filer count or direction moves. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the head denied a position reduction over a sale a double-digit fraction of which came out of stock the filer already held. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as $930.0K of plan-scheduled selling; only $472.0K rode the 10b5-1 plan — $458.0K was sell-to-cover tax withholding on a vest, split out by the filing's own leg-level footnotes. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as $1.5M of plan-scheduled selling; only the amount now shown rode the 10b5-1 plan - the remainder was an issuer-mandated sell-to-cover, split out by the filing's own footnotes. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as $2.7M of plan-scheduled selling; only $1.6M rode the 10b5-1 plan — $1.1M was sell-to-cover tax withholding on a vest, split out by the filing's own leg-level footnotes. Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 10 — this row named the same $661.0K twice and differently. The sentence above says "vest-and-sell (awards settling at $0)" and the clause it carried said "exercise-and-sell (gross)"; the filing settles four restricted stock units at a conversionOrExercisePrice of 0.0000 with no option and no strike anywhere in it, so "exercise" is false and "gross" is empty — gross equals net when the cost is $0. WHY THE ROW CONTRADICTED ITSELF: the aggregate bucket learned to take its NAME from its legs' own evidence on 2026-08-28, after this clause was written, and a re-derived row is left alone when its body is already byte-correct — so the body was fixed and the frozen clause beside it never was. Re-derived through that rule now: the 1 excluded leg(s) carry evidence vest and $0 of acquisition cost, which is "vest-and-sell (awards settling at $0, gross)". THE COUNTED FIGURES ARE UNTOUCHED AND WERE ALWAYS RIGHT: $2.9M across the counted filers, and the excluded $661.0K is still excluded and still not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $1.5M; $38.0M is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing does not support the vest or exercise the sentence named — it either says nothing about what created the shares this sale took, or the sale traces to no creation on the filing at all — so no mechanism is claimed for them; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied; the head denied a position reduction over a sale a double-digit fraction of which came out of stock the filer already held. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as unit under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing does not support the vest or exercise the sentence named — it either says nothing about what created the shares this sale took, or the sale traces to no creation on the filing at all — so no mechanism is claimed for them; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing does not support the vest or exercise the sentence named — it either says nothing about what created the shares this sale took, or the sale traces to no creation on the filing at all — so no mechanism is claimed for them; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-25: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote states the shares were "sold by the Reporting Person to cover tax withholding obligations" on the vesting of RSUs — original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-18: Lovett Scott R. (President, Go to Market) — discretionary sell — $427.2K of FSLY (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001517413-26-000246's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to satisfy tax obligations in connection with the vesting of previously granted Restricted Stock Units.” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-21, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $427.2K really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 3 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $28.60 on 2026-08-18 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 17595, signals id 17605. One identical price across 3 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 3 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing's own footnote says the transaction was made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which the unticked <aff10b5One> checkbox did not carry. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing's own footnote says the transaction was made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which the unticked <aff10b5One> checkbox did not carry. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "46,822 of them were created" — the lot this sale drew on is 23,581 sh (46,822 vs 23,581); the row claimed "46,822 of 50,000 (64%)" — its own two numbers say 94% (46,822/50,000 = 0.9364). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published $1.3M as ONE figure over TWO mechanisms, and the filing splits it. 0001517413-26-000242's own leg-level footnotes put $276.4K on legs the filer chose to sell and $988.2K on legs sold to satisfy tax withholding on a vest — a compulsory sale whose day and size were set by the vest and the tax rate, not by the seller. A single sentence cannot say both, so this row is SCOPED DOWN to the half its own words correctly describe ($276.4K), and the $988.2K of withholding is published as its own row beside this one rather than left inside it or dropped. NO DOLLAR IS LOST AND NONE IS INVENTED: $276.4K + $988.2K = $1.3M, which is what the document reports and what this row used to claim as a single decision. The sentence above is what today's emitters produce for the retained half from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-25: published as a discretionary sell; the filing's own footnote states the shares were "sold by the Reporting Person to cover tax withholding obligations" on the vesting of RSUs — original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 — mechanics-class (mixed 10b5-1 / sell-to-cover split). the row claimed "$1.7M of FSLY" — the filing's own legs total $783.3K (783,340.94 renders as $783.3K, not $1.7M). The other $926,268.20 of the filing is the 2026-08-18 leg, whose own footnote reads "Shares sold to satisfy tax obligations in connection with the vesting of previously granted Restricted Stock Units" — a mandatory sell-to-cover and not a plan sale; it is published as its own row and is not counted here. The 10b5-1 footnote the filing does carry (adopted 2025-06-03) is cited by the three 2026-08-19 legs this row keeps, and by no other leg. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the exercise price was taken from the filer's restatement of it on the code-M line rather than from the option's own term on the derivative leg, and the two disagree. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-18: WONG RICHARD (CFO) — discretionary sell — $4.2M of FSLY (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001517413-26-000244's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to satisfy tax obligations in connection with the vesting of previously granted Restricted Stock Units.” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-21, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $4.2M really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as $8.6M of discretionary selling; only $1.1M was discretionary — $7.5M was sell-to-cover tax withholding on a vest, split out by the filing's own leg-level footnotes. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: published as a plain scheduled sale with `xsell:0` — the detector ran on this filing and returned a negative. It is keyed to transaction code M, and this filer reports his option exercises under code C: two derivative legs titled "stock options (to buy)" at a $31.90 exercise price, underlying "common shares", and F1 says "Represents the conversion upon exercise of stock options into common shares pursuant to a 10b5-1 Plan". Code C is also the letter a SHARE CLASS converts under, which is why it was excluded — so the test is now the surrendered derivative's own title and strike, and a class conversion (empty exercise price, a class name) still reads as one. 356,757 of the 456,757 shares sold (78.1%) were made that morning at a $11.4M strike bill; the direct holding closed 2026-08-18 and 2026-08-19 exactly where it opened and the only real reduction is 100,000 shares on 08-20. The dollars, the actor, the direction and the 10b5-1 claim are unchanged and were always right; what changes is the class and the position-reduction reading. The sentence above is the one the fixed reader publishes for this filing today, re-derived from the filing itself for this repair rather than edited. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the issuer has no market: its symbol is in neither of SEC's ticker books, its own name says fund, and the leg is an instrument no exchange trades, so the word 'open-market' described a venue that does not exist. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the issuer has no market: its symbol is in neither of SEC's ticker books, its own name says fund, and the leg is an instrument no exchange trades, so the word 'open-market' described a venue that does not exist. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing's own footnote says the transaction was made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which the unticked <aff10b5One> checkbox did not carry. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $3.1M; $519.3K is exercise-and-sell (gross) and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $1.1M; 5 insiders counted, 3 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. President" -> "3 insiders"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $9.2M; 13 insiders counted, 11 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CEO, President and a C-suite officer" -> "incl. CEO and a C-suite officer"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $3.6M, re-derived at $2.7M; $625.6K is exercise-and-sell, net of the strike cost and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $4.2M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. a C-suite officer, President and 2 directors" -> "incl. a C-suite officer, President and 1 director"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-28: re-derived again. The constituent filings this cluster is built from have themselves been corrected since this line was last derived — relabelled, netted, voided or deduped by later passes — and the sentence above now follows them instead of the set they were when it was written. What changed: published at $10.1M; 7 insiders counted, 6 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. a C-suite officer, CFO and 4 directors" -> "incl. a C-suite officer, CFO and 3 directors"). Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $24.0M; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. President and Chairman" -> "incl. a C-suite officer and Chairman"). Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $854.0K; 3 insiders counted, 2 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; 2 co-filing note(s) now applied; $60.4K is 10b5-1 scheduled selling and is not discretionary. Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: recomputed from the constituent filings served today. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "the retained count … is not what the filing leaves behind" — the filing leaves exactly the 3,744 the sentence publishes (3,744 == 3,744). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as $172.7K of discretionary selling; only $82.4K was discretionary — $90.3K was sell-to-cover tax withholding on a vest, split out by the filing's own leg-level footnotes. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as $206.8K of discretionary selling; only $178.8K was discretionary — $27.9K was sell-to-cover tax withholding on a vest, split out by the filing's own leg-level footnotes. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the filing does not support the vest or exercise the sentence named — it either says nothing about what created the shares this sale took, or the sale traces to no creation on the filing at all — so no mechanism is claimed for them; the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 8 verifier sweep — the row claimed "$978.0K cost to acquire, $2.1M net" — the filing settles the strike in shares returned to the issuer, so no cash was paid for them (cash from the sale is $3.1M, not $2.1M). Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser and re-checked against it claim by claim. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the day-gap was printed from the wrong end: the phrase hangs off the creation verb and the number is measured from the creation, so 'the next day' dated the vest AFTER the sale it supplied. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: shape sweep — the head denied a position reduction over a sale a double-digit fraction of which came out of stock the filer already held. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-14, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as buy, the filing re-derives as unit under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-14, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published at $1.2M; 3 insiders counted, 2 left once each filing counts once and the tier's own floor is applied; the offices it names are now read off the counted filers' own titles ("incl. CFO and President" -> "incl. CFO and a C-suite officer"). Original text in signal_events]

[CLASS DISCLOSURE 2026-08-22: this line was published before the sell ledger was backfilled on 2026-08-22. Until then the ledger carried no 10b5-1 flag on filings recorded before 2026-08-18, so a plan sale among those filings would have been counted as a decision to sell. The dollar total in this line may therefore include scheduled selling. This is a class statement rather than a finding about this row — nothing here has been recomputed and no figure in this line is being called wrong. Where a filing behind it also appears as its own row, that row carries the 10b5-1 status it was filed with and is unaffected.]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-31: this row published “exercise-and-sell: sold 440 sh, all of them exercised 2 days earlier at $24.21 vs a $28.06 avg sale — $10.7K cost to acquire”. The acquisition it read as an exercise is a CODE-A leg — a grant or award under Rule 16b-3(d), the letter the SEC uses for compensation arriving — and the price on such a leg is the value the award was struck at, not a strike anyone paid. sibyl spent any priced acquisition as a strike without asking which letter carried it, and that false verdict then satisfied the very guard that keeps a grant dated before a sale OUT of the pool, so the row acquired an option, a cost and a net the filer never had. The rule now reads the transaction code before it reads the price (sibyl.XSELL_STRIKE_CODES), and the sentence above is what those emitters produce from the filing re-read on 2026-08-31. WHAT THE SHORTER SENTENCE NO LONGER SAYS, said here instead: the filing also reports a code-A acquisition of 440 sh at $24.21 on 2026-08-15 — a grant, which this feed does not pair with a later sale unless the filing's own words tie them together, and these do not. The correction clause(s) of 2026-08-29 that this row carried are WITHDRAWN with the sentence they defended: they certified a re-derivation of a claim the document does not support, and are in signal_events with the text they were attached to. The sale’s own dollars, date, direction and venue are unchanged. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 9 — the clause this row carried said "the filing's own legs total $0", and the filing says otherwise: 0001628280-26-057934's own legs total $12,857.48, which is the figure this sentence publishes. The "$0" was an empty BUCKET, not an empty filing. Round 8 asked the verifier whether the open-market sale side supported the headline, because that is the side the row's own pre-correction wording named (scheduled sell (10b5-1 plan)); this filing fills the sell-to-cover side instead, and an unfilled side reads as 0.00, which renders as "$0". THE RECLASSIFICATION ROUND 8 PUBLISHED IS RIGHT AND STANDS — the sentence above is re-checked against this filing claim by claim and carries no violation — and no figure, actor or date moved then or now. The verifier now refuses that question rather than answering it. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-29: round 9 — the clause this row carried said "the filing's own legs total $0", and the filing says otherwise: 0001834217-26-000008's own legs total $14,809.50, which is the figure this sentence publishes. The "$0" was an empty BUCKET, not an empty filing. Round 8 asked the verifier whether the open-market sale side supported the headline, because that is the side the row's own pre-correction wording named (discretionary sell); this filing fills the sell-to-cover side instead, and an unfilled side reads as 0.00, which renders as "$0". THE RECLASSIFICATION ROUND 8 PUBLISHED IS RIGHT AND STANDS — the sentence above is re-checked against this filing claim by claim and carries no violation — and no figure, actor or date moved then or now. The verifier now refuses that question rather than answering it. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as vest, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-18, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: Wave 8 — the strike bill, the net proceeds, the retained count or the day-gap were computed over every creation on the filing rather than over the lot this sale actually took. Re-derived from the filing under the fixed parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: published as $142.7K of plan-scheduled selling; only $86.5K rode the 10b5-1 plan — $56.2K was sell-to-cover tax withholding on a vest, split out by the filing's own leg-level footnotes. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-14, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: full-corpus sweep - served as catchup_sell, the filing re-derives as stc under the current parser. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]

[CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-19, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-17, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events]