2026-08-18: Lovett Scott R. (President, Go to Market) — sell-to-cover (tax withholding on a vest) — $427.2K of FSLY (open-market, Form 4, code S) [sold to satisfy tax withholding on an RSU vest per the leg's own footnote — timing and size set by the vest and the tax rate, not by the seller] [CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-18: Lovett Scott R. (President, Go to Market) — discretionary sell — $427.2K of FSLY (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001517413-26-000246's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Shares sold to satisfy tax obligations in connection with the vesting of previously granted Restricted Stock Units.” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-21, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $427.2K really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 3 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $28.60 on 2026-08-18 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 17595, signals id 17605. One identical price across 3 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 3 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]
SEC Form 4 on EDGAR permalink 0001517413-26-000246