2026-07-27: Lewis Michael A (Director) — scheduled sell (10b5-1 plan) — $79.7K of POR (open-market, Form 4, code S) [10b5-1 plan] [sub-threshold WATCH] [CORRECTION 2026-08-31: this row published “exercise-and-sell: sold 1,537 sh, all of them exercised 3 days earlier at $52.05 vs a $51.83 avg sale — $80.0K cost to acquire”. The acquisition it read as an exercise is a CODE-A leg — a grant or award under Rule 16b-3(d), the letter the SEC uses for compensation arriving — and the price on such a leg is the value the award was struck at, not a strike anyone paid. sibyl spent any priced acquisition as a strike without asking which letter carried it, and that false verdict then satisfied the very guard that keeps a grant dated before a sale OUT of the pool, so the row acquired an option, a cost and a net the filer never had. The rule now reads the transaction code before it reads the price (sibyl.XSELL_STRIKE_CODES), and the sentence above is what those emitters produce from the filing re-read on 2026-08-31. WHAT THE SHORTER SENTENCE NO LONGER SAYS, said here instead: the filing also reports a code-A acquisition of 3,073 sh at $52.05 on 2026-07-24 — a grant, which this feed does not pair with a later sale unless the filing's own words tie them together, and these do not. The correction clause(s) of 2026-08-29 that this row carried are WITHDRAWN with the sentence they defended: they certified a re-derivation of a claim the document does not support, and are in signal_events with the text they were attached to. The sale’s own dollars, date, direction and venue are unchanged. Original text in signal_events]
SEC Form 4 on EDGAR permalink 0001423238-26-000008