2026-08-10: Plump Andrew Stewart (Director, President, R&D) — sell-to-cover (tax withholding on a vest) — $2.8M of TAK (open-market, Form 4, code S) [sold to satisfy tax withholding on an RSU vest per the leg's own footnote — timing and size set by the vest and the tax rate, not by the seller] [CORRECTION 2026-08-26: the sentence opened on 2026-08-12, the day EDGAR indexed the filing. A sibyl event date is the TRADE date (owner ruling 2026-08-22) and this filing's own trade date is 2026-08-10, which the row's traded_date column has always held. Head date rewritten; no figure changed. Original text in signal_events] [CORRECTION 2026-09-01: round 13 — this row published “2026-08-10: Plump Andrew Stewart (Director, President, R&D) — discretionary sell — $2.8M of TAK (open-market, Form 4, code S)”, and its own filing says the seller had no say in it. 0001493152-26-037507's footnote F1, cited by the disposal leg this row counts, reads: “Represents a mandatory sale to cover taxes associated with the vesting of equity awards held by the Reporting Person.” That is a sell-to-cover: the shares were sold because an award vested and a withholding rate said how many, so neither the DAY nor the SIZE was a decision, and `informed:1` — the strongest bearish qualifier this feed has — was asserted over money nobody chose to raise. THE SENTENCE PREDATES THE RULE THAT READS ITS OWN FOOTNOTE. The sell-to-cover family is not one pattern but a growing set of arms, each added because a live filer stated the same mechanism in words none of the existing ones could reach — five widenings since the class shipped, the most recent of them today. This row was published on 2026-08-13, the arm that classifies it arrived afterwards, and nothing re-read the filing in between. This row was already live at the last full-corpus sweep (2026-08-26), so its filing was re-read once — under a parser that could not yet see this — and passed. THAT IS THE FINDING THIS PASS EXISTS TO MEASURE AND IT IS NOT ABOUT THIS ROW: a widening only ever reaches the rows somebody goes back and re-reads, so every arm shipped since the last full-corpus pass left a shadow behind it, and until today nothing had counted them. NO DOLLAR FIGURE, DATE, SHARE COUNT, ACTOR OR DIRECTION CHANGES: $2.8M really did leave, the direction stays BEARISH by house policy because this is a mechanics relabel and not a re-reading of the trade, and the sentence above is what today's emitters produce from this filing re-read on 2026-09-01. AND IT WAS NOT THIS SELLER'S EVENT EITHER: 13 insiders of the same issuer sold at ONE IDENTICAL $17.10 on 2026-08-10 and every one of them lands in this same class — this row and signals id 13579, signals id 13601, signals id 13603, signals id 13619, signals id 13666, signals id 13693, signals id 13697, signals id 13827, signals id 13834, signals id 13838, signals id 13842, signals id 13855. One identical price across 13 separate filings is an issuer-run withholding run settled for several officers at once, not 13 people who each chose the same morning and were each filled at the same number. Original text in signal_events]
SEC Form 4 on EDGAR permalink 0001493152-26-037507