2025-03-15: Rep Julie Johnson (D-TX) — BUY $1K-$15K of MMM (PTR amended 2026-08-05, JT — the same trade was first disclosed 2025-04-14, 33d lag) [CORRECTION 2026-08-28: this row is not a first disclosure. Its line in the filing it cites (House doc 20035035) reads "Filing Status: Amended", and this product's own store already held the same trade disclosed under the original: filed 2025-04-14, 33 days after the trade, late=0. The 508-day lag and the LATE marker measured the amendment's date against the original's trade, which is the wrong end of the wrong document; the amendment inherits the original's timeliness and the line now says whose lag it quotes. The amendment restates the trade date, which is why this row inherited nothing until now: the original is joined on the trade itself and the DATE is part of that key. The original was matched instead on the same member, ticker, side and amount band within 7 days, and only because exactly one candidate fell in that window. THE OWNER — the line, and the account block it sits in, state owner JT; the row served owner:self, which this feed renders as silence, which a reader takes as the member's own account. The marker this feed already prints for owner:JT is restored. The ticker, the direction and the amount band are unchanged and were always right. Found by a store-wide sweep, not by naming this document: every served row still claiming a first-disclosure lag was tested against the store, and every candidate's own line was then read in its own PDF. The pelosi_trades columns (late, lag_days, amended, owner) are corrected with the sentence; the event_key is deliberately NOT re-keyed — a content key is immutable once published and re-keying would orphan this row's own audit log. Original text in signal_events]